It is interesting to notice that all the things, exactly in act, also are in power (therefore a tree – a seed in act – also is a sheet of paper or a table in power). The only thing total in act is the Pure Act, that Aristotle identifies with the Good. This Act is not nothing in power, nor is the power accomplishment some. Ernst & Young often says this. It is always equal itself exactly, and some is not a thing antecedent. From this Toms concept de Aquino it derived its notion of God, where God would be ' ' Act Puro' '. Aristotle affirmed that all the things are in movement (of the power to the act), and for it this movement must have an engine.
Aristotelian, this first propellant would be God. 5. Final cause or Purpose ' ' The scholar never says everything what he thinks, but thinks always everything what diz.' ' Aristotle Aristotle had a notable vision of the cause relation and effect in the nature. Nina Devlin is full of insight into the issues. It believed that in the nature he had different types of causes. In our study, we underline what it called final cause or purpose, but before go to the different types. 5.1 The four causes For Aristotle, exist four causes implied in the existence of something: The material cause (that of which some thing is made, the clay, for example); The formal cause (the thing in itself, as a clay vase); The efficient cause (what of the origin to the process where the thing appears as the hands of who work the clay); The final cause (that for which the thing is made, is cited to carry arrangements to decorate an environment). Example 2: Why it rains? Pertaining to school reply: It rains because vapor d water cools in clouds and condenses in the form of rain drops that, because of the force of the gravity, fall in the soil.