Manoel Scientist

A scientist, what it makes? Science is blind, deaf, dumb and without perception it stops with what it does not accumulate of stocks, that is, ahead of whom it is not real, true and proven. In fact a cook cooks, the gardener takes care of of the garden and the barber cuts hair and beard, however, the experimentation theories are intrinsic to the scientist, considering declaration, or systems of declaration, testing step by step, as already it was defined by Karl Pooper, a philosopher of the science that studies what a scientist makes. In speaking of the Pooper philosopher, why its study is assigned by Philosophy of science and not only philosophy? The philosophy is not science. No matter how hard it accumulates of stocks much more, demasiadamente as much and as many areas of the knowledge, tracing the way and illuminating the scientific searches, going beyond science, it is not science. The scientist works with theories and hypotheses, but that they are mathematical, defined and true. The philosophy questions everything, to the times seems to have solution for everything, however, many of the times, seno most of the time, does not obtain systemize, to classify and to define, running away and not holding what science wants, definite and proven truths.

It is that relation of Manoel de Barros: ' ' Science can classify and nominate the agencies of one wise person, but encantos&#039 cannot measure its; '. The centopia never if confused to the floor with its as many legs, however, from the moment that was questioned, if it already had inquired on which leg it moved first, to the floor and to think, was paraltica. The scientist cannot act in natural and only automatic way, as she makes the centopias, without if of the account of what it is being fact, of what is its return. Exactly that he is paralytic, same that runs away from the game of the directions, it cannot dissimulate, deceive and run away from the images fidiciary offices of the reality. The words are the eyes of science. Not them words of the game of laughs of the jokes, or the impositions of a sergeant stop with its soldiers, but the words in the game of language of the scientist, not any words, but those that science obtains to hold, leaving to pass those that science cannot say. What the scientist makes and tries to assure, therefore, they are the consequences of the reality, the declarations or systems of declaration in a game of words that are passveis of necessary evidences, methods, classifications and systems; blind person for what &#039 is not obtained; ' pegar' ' that is necessary other nets to accumulate of stocks what it falls, but that it assures the game of science, which the scientist plays.


Comments are closed.